Senior journalist AshishKhetan has written a letter petition in public interest to the Allahabad HC wherein he claims that evidences of innocence of Khalid Mujahid and other co-accused were deliberately kept away from the court.
By TCN News,
Lucknow: Senior Investigative journalist and founder of investigative news-portal Gulail.com, AshishKhetan has written a letter petition to the Chief Justice of the Allahabad High Court seeking intervention into the arrest of Muslim youths on dubious terror charges.
Through his investigations and researches, Khetan claims to have found documents that according to him clearly show that t Muse cases against Muslim youths –most of whom are from poor background – were fabricated.
Placing all the documents he has gathered, Khetan writes in the letter petition, written in public interest, “an overwhelming number of terror cases different police agencies have misled the courts in particular and the people in general by wrongly implicating innocent members of the minority community.”
Referring to Khalid Mujahid, who was charged in Lucknow and Faizabad Courts Blasts, 2007 and who died in custody last month after spending more than six years in jail, Khetan writes, “The material I’m placing before this court shows that the evidence of his innocence as well as that of his three co-accused was deliberately kept from the courts.”
In five other cases, Khetan claims to have researched in which the accused have been languishing in jail for seven to eight years. He adds that in one such instance even a ten-year sentence has been pronounced. Referring to the case, he writes, “The material I’m placing before this court shows that Waliullah too was not involved in bomb blasts for which he had been charged. The matter thus is of great moment and equally great urgency.”
Khetan, during his earlier tenure with the weekly magazine Tehelka did a sting operation and authored investigative reports on many important cases including those arising from the Gujarat riots of 2002, such as the NarodaGaon, NarodaPatiya and Gulberg Society massacres and the Best Bakery carnage.
It was after his ‘sting operation’ in the infamous Best Bakery case, the Supreme Court had constituted a Quasi Judicial Committee headed by the then Registrar General, Supreme Court.
Listing the seven terror cases Khetan claims, “In all these abovementioned cases the UP Police have arrested and sent for trial nine members of the Muslim Community who have been in jail for anywhere between six to eight years.” Those cases are:
(i) SankatMochanMandir Blast, 7 March, 2006, Varanasi.
(ii) Cantonment Railway Station Blast, 7 March, 2006, Varanasi
(iii) Triple Blasts, 22 May, 2007, Gorakhpur.
(iv) Varanasi Court Blast, 23 November, 2007.
(v) Faizabad Court Blast, 23 November, 2007.
(vi) Lucknow Court Blast, 23 November, 2007.
(vii) Shramjeevi Express Blast, 28 July, 2005.
Khetan further added, “The internal records that I am presenting before this court suggest that an entirely different set of accused than those who had been originally arrested and chargesheeted in these seven cases are believed by other terror investigation agencies to be involved in these cases.”
In the case of Lucknow and Faizabad Court Blasts and also in the Gorakhpur Triple Blast case the UP police fabricated an imaginary connection between the accused originally arrested and the terror suspects arrested many months and in some cases a few years after the arrest of original accused, he further wrote.
Khetan has hence urged the CJ to intervene and order an independent enquiry and fresh investigationin all of these seven cases and to direct "consequential relief to the victims of such operation".
He earlier wrote a similar letter petition to the Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court in “deliberate framing of Muslims in terror cases by the Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) of Maharashtra.”
Related:
AshishKhetan sends letter petition to CJ of Bombay HC on framing of innocent Muslims
Full text of the letter:
To,
The Hon’ble the Chief Justice
and his companion Justices of the
Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad,
1. I am a journalist of 12 years standing. During that period, I authored investigative reports on many important cases including those arising from the Gujarat riots of 2002, such as the NarodaGaon, NarodaPatiya and Gulberg Society massacres and the Best Bakery carnage. My investigative reports have received acclaim, and have also been used by investigators and the courts of law. In 2007 after my investigative report on the Gujarat riots was published widely, the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) ordered an enquiry into the revelations in my report containing approximately 60 hours of video footage. On the orders of the NHRC, the tapes were tested by FSL, Jaipur and were found completely authentic. Subsequent to the publication of my investigations (or ‘sting operation’, in common parlance) in October 2007, the Supreme Court constituted a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to re-investigate many cases pertaining to the Godhra and post-Godhra riots. SIT cited me as a prosecution witness in three major riot cases. My testimony in this regard has been relied upon by the trial court in the NarodaPatiya case and several convictions were based on my evidence. I attach as ANNEXURE I, the judgment passed in the NarodaPatiya massacre case referring to my testimony. Meanwhile, I have testified as a prosecution witness in the NarodaGaon and Gulberg Society cases, the verdict in which is awaited.
2. After my ‘sting operation’ in the infamous Best Bakery case, the Supreme Court constituted a Quasi Judicial Committee headed by the then Registrar General, Supreme Court, which too found my investigative reports authentic and trustworthy. Many of the findings of the committee were based on my report alone. A copy of inquiry report submitted by the then Registrar General Mr. BM Gupta dated 27.05.2005 is Annexed hereto as ANNEXURE II. It was, inter-alia, my reportage on Hindutva terror groups that catalysed the investigation in the Malegaon blasts of 2006, the Samjhauta Express blasts, the Ajmer Sharif blasts and the Hyderabad Mecca Masjid blasts. As a result, the innocent persons hitherto arrested for these outrages were released on bail and the prosecution turned to those now believed to have been actually responsible for these terror attacks.
3. I am approaching your Hon’ble Court by this letter petition in public interest, for my recent investigative efforts as a journalist have led to a clear and compelling picture of the deliberate framing of innocent Muslims--most of them very young and very poor--in terror cases by the police agencies of Uttar Pradesh. The consequences should shock judicial conscience. In one instance an accused named Khalid Mujahid who was charged in Lucknow and Faizabad Courts Blasts, 2007 has recently died in a police van while being escorted between jail and courts. Mujahid was in jail for more than six years and the material I’m placing before this court shows that the evidence of his innocence as well as that of his three co-accused was deliberately kept from the courts. In five other other cases I’ve researched the accused have been languishing in jail for seven to eight years. In one of these cases the accused named Waliullah has been given a ten-year sentence. The material I’m placing before this court shows that Waliullah too was not involved in bomb blasts for which he had been charged. The matter thus is of great moment and equally great urgency.
4. For more than one year I’ve been researching terror investigations across the country. My research shows that in an overwhelming number of terror cases different police agencies have misled the courts in particular and the people in general by wrongly implicating innocent members of the minority community. In this regard I’ve recently filed a letter petition before the Bombay High Court drawing the Hon'ble Court’s attention to three terror cases where the lives of 21 Muslims had been wantonly destroyed by the Maharashtra Anti-terrorism Squad by tutoring witnesses (many of whom were stool pigeons), planting arms and explosives on these innocent persons and by extracting false confessions under the special act named MCOCA. A copy of the letter petition is placed as Annexure III.
5. During my research I have collected internal records also known as interrogation reports of several terror suspects recorded by different anti-terror agencies of the country that narrate an entirely contradictory story of at least seven terror cases related to the state of Uttar Pradesh than that told by the UP police to the courts currently trying these cases. Shockingly, some of these interrogation reports have been prepared by the agencies like Anti-terrorism squad of the Uttar Pradesh police itself—the very same police that is behind the arrests and investigations of some of these cases. These records show that the police have built prosecution cases that are at complete variance at the evidence that exists on their internal records.
6. But in order to ensure that the full truth never comes to light and that the courts in Uttar Pradesh never learn the farcical nature of these terror probes, the Uttar Pradesh Police have concealed these interrogation reports by taking advantage of the fact that these are almost never in the public domain. By keeping these reports under lock and key and also by doctoring them, on occasion, the agencies are seeking to sustain cases that they full well know to be bogus. I’m presenting before the court the very same material.
7. These seven terror cases are as following:
(i). SankatMochanMandir Blast, 7 March, 2006, Varanasi.
(ii). Cantonment Railway Station Blast, 7 March, 2006, Varanasi
(iii). Triple Blasts, 22 May, 2007, Gorakhpur.
(iv). Varanasi Court Blast, 23 November, 2007.
(v). Faizabad Court Blast, 23 November, 2007.
(vi). Lucknow Court Blast, 23 November, 2007.
(vii). Shramjeevi Express Blast, 28 July, 2005.
8. In all these abovementioned cases the UP Police have arrested and sent for trial nine members of the Muslim Community who have been in jail for anywhere between six to eight years. In the case of Shramjeevi Express Blast, three Bangladeshi nationals besides an Indian national are in jail for the last seven years. Recently, one accused named in the Faizabad and Lucknow Court Blasts, Khalid Mujahid, a teacher by profession and who was in jail for around six years, died under mysterious circumstances in judicial custody. As stated, a majority of these accused are poor and backward.
9. The internal records that I am presenting before this court suggest that an entirely different set of accused than those who had been originally arrested and chargesheeted in these seven cases are believed by other terror investigation agencies to be involved in these cases. Investigation agencies like the Maharashtra ATS, Gujarat Police and UP ATS have a version of the UP terror cases, which are completely at variance with what is lead before the courts in UP. A set of terror suspects were arrested much after the arrest of the original accused. What is extremely significant is that in the interrogation reports prepared by different agencies (including UP ATS) these terror suspects had neither suggested nor claimed of having any even remote linkage or connection with those accused who had been originally arrested for these blasts by the different arms of the UP Police.
10. But in the case of Lucknow and Faizabad Court Blasts and also in the Gorakhpur Triple Blast case the UP police fabricated an imaginary connection between the accused originally arrested and the terror suspects arrested many months and in some cases a few years after the arrest of original accused. Two completely conflicting narratives were thus married to retrospectively validate the old investigations. This cynical attempt to merge two conflicting narratives in order to cover-up the wrongful arrests made previously, gets exposed by the material I’m placing before this court.
12. In most of these seven terror cases the original accused have also been booked separately for recovery of arms and explosives. If these accused were not involved in these bomb attacks to begin with, as these internal records suggest, then serious questions also arise about the genuineness of these recoveries.
13. My intent is not to establish guilt of any individual. I want to bring to notice of this Hon’ble court the full facts in each of these seven blast cases that were never presented by the investigating agencies before the courts. The material I’m placing compellingly establishes that the evidence and revelations that militated against and debunked the prosecution theory in each of these seven terror attacks were either conveniently brushed under the carpet or altered and manipulated to validate the sham investigations done previously. This bewildering scale of manipulation betrays the absolute contempt for the due process of law, justice and truth displayed by the Uttar Pradesh police.
14. What also emerges is that the State of Uttar Pradesh has on different occasions and before different courts including the Allahabad High Court has cynically perpetrated gross injustice by concealing material evidence of the innocence of those accused, and instead is appearing to be bountiful by wanting to withdraw prosecution. While on one hand the state of Uttar Pradesh has been seeking to withdraw some cases against the accused originally named in Sankatmochan Blast, Varanasi, Gorakhpur Blasts and Faizabad and Lucknow Court Blasts on the grounds of public interest and communal harmony, on the other hand the material that could have established their innocence and which is in the possession of state police agencies has not been shared with the courts. Thus what is really a constitutional right of these innocent men to have their innocence established and their liberty and dignity restored is being turned into an undue State largess with an eye on political and electoral gains, thus causing much resentment all around.
15. The gruesome acts of terror demand equal justice and a search of full and unvarnished truth. But this unstated State policy of weaving a web of lies and half truths is not only eroding the very core of the rule of law, it is also gnawing away at the mutual trust between different communities and rupturing our society. Recently a few advocates filed a PIL before the Allahabad High Court challenging the government’s proposed move of withdrawing certain terror related cases against members of the Muslim Community. On the other hand such sham police investigations and deliberate targeting of a certain section of the citizenry by the agencies is causing alienation among the members of the minority community.
16. As a result neither the victims of ghastly terror attacks nor those innocent youths who have been falsely implicated are being given justice. Every time an innocent person is framed in a terror case, the real culprits do not just get away but also get emboldened. Therefore, what I am placing before you is not just aberrations in investigations or minor breaches, but a whole stylised operation conducted with active prejudice. If unchecked, such a course will only serve to increase the terror threat that this nation faces and further endanger our internal security.
17. I am aware that normally, investigation of crime is the task of the police and verdicts of guilt or innocence, the realm of courts. What makes me intervene in this process is the fact that the same has become the reverse of what it is intended to be. When the police deliberately obstructs justice and misleads courts of law, it cannot be left unchecked, and it is my duty as a citizen and a journalist to invite the attention of the highest custodians of justice to the facts that I have unearthed, particularly when the consequences to our national security are so dire.
18. The material I seek to place before this Hon’bleCourt, is for the sake of convenience put under the following heads SadiqIsrarShaikh, ArifBadar alias Laddan, MohdSaif, SaifurRahman, Sarwar and Mohd. Salman.
18.1. These heads are named after the terror suspects arrested by different police agencies between September 2008 and March, 2010. The Investigative agencies have on their record a single, integral terror plot of which the above-mentioned six arrestees have been claimed to be a part. The narrative given by these six accused is consistent with the case of different agencies in different cities outside Uttar Pradesh. According to the internal records of these multiple investigative agencies all these six accused have confessed to their involvement in the single terror conspiracy of which these seven terror strikes pertaining to state of UP (as mentioned above) were also a part. These records show that these six terror suspects have given a detailed and meticulous account of their involvement and involvement of other accomplices in these bomb attacks. Significantly the ‘confessions’ nor the investigation reports of these six suspects make any mention whatsoever of the involvement of the nine youths who were originally arrested and chargesheeted by the UP Police for these blasts. In fact the terror plot as narrated by these six terror suspects as recorded by different agencies on different dates completely debunks the prosecution case as its stands today in each of these seven terror strikes in both its material and minute details.
20 SadiqIsrarShaikh son of Israr Ahmed Shaikh Permanent Address; Phoolpur Tehsil, Azamgarh, temporary address at the time of arrest: Trombay, Mumbai (arrested in September, 2008)
20.1 In July and September 2008, there were serial blasts in Delhi, Ahmedabad and Surat (aborted blasts). Following some leads in these blasts, the Mumbai Crime Branch arrested one Sadiq Sheikh along with 20 other accused from Mumbai and other parts of Maharashtra in the month of September 2008.
20.2 This was a crucial juncture in terror investigations in India. In a span of a little over one year between August 2007 and September 2008, there were terror bombings in Bangalore (seven serial blasts of July 2008), Hyderabad (Lumbini Park and GokulChaat Blasts of August 2007), UP (Synchronized blasts at Court premises in Lucknow, Varanasi and Faizabad, November 2007), Jaipur (serial blasts of May 2008), Ahmedabad (21 serial blasts in July 2008) and Surat (Aborted attempt as eighteen Bombs malfunctioned) and Delhi (Five syncronized bomb blasts in market places of Delhi in September, 2008).
20.3 The series of bombings across India indicated a single, integral conspiracy and consequently brought several investigating agencies of different states together and pooling of information. In other words the set of men arrested following the 2007 and 2008 set of bombings across the country were interrogated by Ahmedabad, Delhi, UP, Karnataka and other police teams of other states and were subsequently made common accused in all these blasts pertaining to the period of 2007-08.
20.4 Sadiq Sheikh and his alleged ‘Indian Mujahideen’ accomplices were interrogated by different police agencies on different dates. Each agency prepared detailed Interrogation Reports (IRs). My sources in Mumbai police and state police agencies of Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Uttar Pradesh and Karnataka who were involved in investigating ‘Indian Mujahideen’ and its alleged involvement in the 2007 and 2008 blasts provided me the Interrogation Reports of Sadiq Sheikh and others prepared by each of these agencies (All these interrogation reports of SadiqShaikh are annexed as Annexure IV).
20.5 The significant aspect of these IRs for this Court is that Sadiq not only spoke about his involvement in the blasts that occurred during 2007-2008 but also the following blasts that occurred between 2003 and 2007:
1. Dashavmeghghat, Varanasi, 2004 (the bomb packed in a container reportedly failed to explode)
2. Shramjeevi Express Blast ,Jaunpur, UP., 2005
3. Diwali Blasts, Delhi, 2005
4. Sankatmochan Temple and Cant Railway Station Blasts, Varanasi, 2006
5. Mumbai Train Blasts, 2006
20.6 The agencies have themselves claimed (both in court and in public) that Sadiq’s interrogation led to the arrest of over 70 terror suspects by UP ATS, Hyderabad CIC, Ahmedabad Crime Branch, Rajasthan ATS and Delhi Special Cell. The content of these reports, and ‘confessions’ etc is part of the charge-sheets filed by different agencies. But curiously Sadiq and his accomplices were charge-sheeted in only those blast cases in which the investigation was still not completed. Hyderabad Blasts (Gokul Chat and Lumbini Park) of 2007, Ahmedabad and Surat (aborted) Blasts of 2008, Delhi Blasts of 2008 were some of the cases in which the alleged Indian Mujahideen members were charges-sheeted.
20.7 But those of Sadiq’s “revelations” that related to the blasts like Shramjeevi Express and Sankatmochan Temple were conveniently brushed under the carpet.
20.8. All these agencies were equally aware that an entirely different set of persons had been put on trial for these blasts, which set of accused could only be innocent, if the later 2008 Interrogation reports were true.
20.9. Thus at least after 2008 September, all the said agencies including UP Police were privy to the nature of evidence and revelations pertaining to the Shramjeevi and the 2006 Varanasi blasts among other blast cases. They also heavily relied on these revelations in the investigations pertaining to the 2007-2008 bombings. But those revelations that talked about the blasts carried out before 2007 were ignored because those cases had already been claimed to have been solved. This policy of pick and choose raises a serious question about the integrity of terror investigations and the conduct of the UP Police.
20.10.The lack of bonafides is further evident from the fact that no attempt was made to arrive at the truth or exonerate one set of obviously innocent persons. None of these agencies placed the entire relevant material before the courts trying an entirely unconnected set of men for the Shramjeevi Express Blast, Sankatmochan and Cantonment Railway Station Blasts. Why?
20.11.As per these internal records, SadiqShaikh along with one AtifAmeen (who was killed in Batla House Encounter) had planted the bomb at Shramjeevi Express with absolutely no connection with the four persons (three of whom are Bangladeshi nationals) who had already been arrested and chargesheeted by the Railway police. If SadiqShaikh is to be believed than while he and his other Indian Mujahideen accomplices kept carrying one terror strike after another between 2004 and 2008, different state police agencies kept framing unconnected and innocent persons in these blast cases.
20.12.Again I’d like to reiterate before this Hon'ble court that my intent is not pass a verdict of guilt against anyone. But it is to only highlight the blatant discrepancies and contradictions in terror investigations.
21. ArifBadar son of Badruddin (72); Permanent Address- Village Isroli, Sarai Mir, Azamgarh, UP (arrested in September, 2008)
21.1 Like SadiqShaikk, AribBadar was also arrested by Mumbai Police. He was arrested on 24.09.2008. During interrogation before every agency ArifBadar confessed to his involvement in almost all the blasts done by “Indian Mujahideen” between 2004 and 2008. He was interrogated by different agencies on different dates. These internal interrogation reports show that ArifBadar was an electrician by profession and played a specialized role of preparing timers for the bombs that were then planted by his accomplices. Interrogation Reports of ArifBadar prepared by Ahmedabad and Mumbai Police Crime Branch are placed at Annexure V.
21.2 As per these interrogation reports ArifBadar made timers for the bombs that were planted by his accomplices in Sankatmochan, Cantonment Railway Station and busy market places in Varanasi in 2006, the bombs that were planted in the market places of Gorakhpur city in May, 2007 and Lucknow, Faizabad and Varanasi Courts in 2007 among many other blasts carried out in other states like Maharashtra, Delhi and Gujarat in which Arif claimed to have made timers.
21.3 Also ArifBadar is on record to have confessed to being a core member of this single, integral terror plot that was first hatched in 2003-2004 and as per which blasts were carried out between 2004 and 2008. Badar gave descriptions of all those who were involved in these blasts. But the four youths—Ubaid-ur-Rahman, AlamgurHussain, Hilaluddin (all Banglsdeshis) and NafequlBiswas--who were chargesheeted in Shramjeevi Express Blasts, one person named Tariq Qazmi who was chargesheeted in Gorakhpur Blasts of 2007, a Muslim cleric named Waliullah who was chargesheeted for 2006 Varanasi blasts and four persons—Tariq Qazmi, Khalid Mujahid, Sajad-ur-rahman and MohdAkhtar-- who have been chargesheeted for Faizabad and Lucknow Court Blasts find no mention whatsoever in his interrogation reports. Though ArifBadar claimed to have played a role in all these blasts and has also claimed to have intimate knowledge about all those who were involved along with him in these abovementioned blasts. Still the UP police nor other agencies brought all this material to the notice of the courts trying Shramjeevi , Varanasi, Gorakhpur, Lucknow and Faizabad blasts. Pertinent to note is the fact that ArifBadar’s revelations and admissions have been incorporated in those terror cases (like Ahmedabad blasts) that occurred during 2007-2008 and in which the investigation was still open. But in cases like Varanasi, Gorakhpur and UP Court Blasts, ArifBadar’s revelations were brushed under the carpet. Why?
22. SaifurRahman son of Abdul Rahman Ansari, resident of Badarka, Azamgarh (arrested in April, 2009)
22.1 In April 2009, another alleged Indian Mujahideen operative SaifurRahman was arrested by the Madhya Pradesh police. I’m placing at Annexure VI, the interrogation report of SaifurRahman prepared by none other than but the UP ATS.
22.2. As per this IR, SaifurRahman has given a detailed account of the several blasts like Ahmedabad and Jaipur blasts he was involved in.
22.3 What is significant for this court is the fact that he admitted to his involvement in the conspiracy of UP Courts Blasts and specifically admitted to his involvement in planting the bomb at Faizabad Court Premises. What is equally significant is the fact that he has made no mention of the four accused—namely, Dr Tariq Qazmi, Khalid Mujahid, Sajad-ur-rahman and MohdAkhtar who had already been chargesheeted for the Faizabad and Lucknow Court Blast. As per this IR there is absolutely no connection of the above mentioned four accused in the UP Court Blasts. In fact the narration of the conspiracy given by SaifurRahman is completely different from the one pressed by the UP ATS in the concerned courts.
22.4. Truth cannot have different versions for different purposes. But when it comes to terror cases it appears that there is one for agency’s internal consumption and another for the courts. Between courts also one version is pressed before the courts in one state and another (and contradictory version) is peddled before other courts. Why has UP,ATS concealed these material facts pertaining to SaifurRahman’s disclosure from the courts that are trying Faizabad and Lucknow court blast cases. One of the accused named Khalid Mujahid, who if SaifurRahman is to believed had no connection with the blasts, has already died in judicial custody.
22.5. Like other so-called Indian Mujahideen suspects, SaifurRahman has been shown accused in selective blast cases as per the whims and fancies of the agencies. Some of his disclosures like that pertaining to Ahmedabad Blasts have been accepted by some agencies while that pertaining to UP Court Blasts have been conveniently brushed aside.
23. MohdSaif, son of Shadab Ahmed resident of SanjarpurAzamgarh, UP (arrested by Delhi Police in September 2008)
23.1 I am placing as Annexure VII, four interrogation reports of MohdSaif prepared by three different agencies, namely, UP ATS, Maharashtra ATS and Ahmedabad Crime Branch. All these IRs are identical in their material particulars.
23.2 Almost seven months before SaifurRahman’s arrest, a terror suspect MohdSaif was arrested from Batla House.
23.3. Saif is said to have given a similar account of Faizabad, Lucknow and Varanasi Court Blasts conspiracy as later narrated by SaifurRahman seven months after Saif’s arrest.
23.4 Saif spoke about his involvement in the blasts at Lucknow, Faizabad and Varanasi Court Premises, Gorakhpur Blasts of year 2007 and Varanasi Blasts of 2006 besides 2008 Jaipur, Ahmedabad and Delhi Blasts. But Saif’s disclosures have absolutely no reference to Waliullah who had been charged for Varanasi Blasts. Similarly Saif doesn’t make any mention of Dr. Tariq Qazmi who had been charged for Gorakhpur Blasts and Khalid Mujahid and others who had been charged for the Court Blasts. Forget connection in the blasts, neither Saif, nor SadiqShaikh, nor SaifurRahman nor ArifBadar make any mention of even remote acquaintance of these men who had been originally arrested for these attacks.
24. MohdSarwar son of Master MohdHanif, resident of Village Chandpatti, Tehsil Sangdi, District Azamgarh (arrested in January, 2009).
24.1. I am placing as Annexure VIII, an interrogation report of a terror suspect MohdSarwar prepared by the UP ATS. Sarwar was arrested in January, 2009.
24.2 As per this IR, Sarwar was involved in 2006 Varanasi blasts. Besides his own involvement Sarwar talks about the involvement of others, namely AtifAmeen, MohdSaif, Shadab Malik, Ariz alias Junaid and AsadullahAkhtar (all residents of Azamgarh).
24.3 Both Sarwar and Saif were arrested several months apart. Both have given a similar account of the 2006 Varanasi blasts. More significantly, both make no reference to Waliullah, an imam of a mosque in Allahabad, and his three alleged accomplices (who the UP police claimed were Bangladeshi nationals and thus could never be identified or traced). In other words, if Saif, SadiqShaikh, ArifBadar and Sarwar are to be believed, then Waliullah had no role in the 2006 Varanasi blasts.
24.4.Waliullah has already been given a ten-year sentence for the recovery of arms and explosives by a court in Lucknow. Both these cases that is the case of recovery and Varanasi blasts are inter-connected. The question that arises is if Waliullah was not involved in the blasts, then how authentic and genuine were the recoveries on the basis of which he was given ten-year sentence? All this contradictory material was neither placed before the Lucknow court that gave the 10- year sentence nor has it been placed before a Ghaziabad court trying the Varanasi blasts. Waliullah has been in jail since 2006.
25. Mohd Salman, son of MohdShakeel, Permanent of Sanjarpur, Azamgarh
25.1 The last in the series of these six arrests was of Mohd Salman, 18 years, in March, 2010. I’m placing at Annexure IX, the interrogation report of Salman prepared by the UP ATS.
25.2 In this IR, Salman talks about his involvement in Gorakhpur Blasts of 2007, UP Court Blasts of 2007 besides other blasts like Jaipur and Ahmedabad Blasts of 2008.
25.3. Salman corroborates the account of Gorakhpur and Court Blasts as given by the likes of MohdSaif, SaifurRahman and ArifBadar alias Laddan who were arrested and interrogated many months before his arrest. None of these suspects had the occasion to know as to what others had told the interrogators.
25.4 Most of these interrogations reports have been marked as classified and have never been shared with any court.
26. UP Police tries to mislead the Courts.
26.1 In the face of this overwhelmingly contradictory material cited herein, the UP Police came up with a new theory. In a few submissions made before courts, the UP police came up with the theory that 2006 Varanasi blasts and 2007 Court Blasts were done jointly by Indian Mujahideen and Bangladesh based terror outfit HUJI. It was done so because all those nine persons who had been originally arrested were shown as members of HUJI. But all the interrogation reports cited above have absolutely no reference to HUJI or its members.
26.2 The question is on what basis has the UP Police harmonized their old investigations with the subsequent revelations? If the IRs of these alleged Indian Mujahideen terror suspects have not even remote reference to HUJI or those who had been arrested by the UP Police then on what grounds has the UP Police reached the conclusion that these were joint operations. The only logical conclusion one can draw is that it was done to cover-up the previous wrongful arrests so that delinquent cops don’t have to face the consequences of manufacturing evidence and implicating innocent persons.
26.3. The absurdity of this theory is further brought out by the fact that this “joint HUJI-IM operations theory” was never pressed in the shape of a chargesheet before the courts concerned.
26.5 These are seven investigations that I have researched in the state of Uttar Pradesh. There is no knowing how many other cases in the State have similar features, and given the carte blanche the Governments have tended to give our anti-terror outfits, that function with absolute power under absolute secrecy, in all probability the story of perverting the criminal justice system goes beyond just these seven cases. I’ve already brought to the notice of the Bombay High Court the framing of 21 innocent Muslim youth in three terror cases, namely Mumbai train blasts of 2006, Malegaon Blasts of 2006 and Pune German bakery Blast of 2010.
26.6 These are issues of grave public importance that go beyond mere legality. It’s not just the security of our nation but also the very idea of Indian democracy that is under threat and so I have straightaway chosen to put this material across to every institution concerned with upholding human rights, constitutional values and accountability. Thus I approach this Court by way of public interest and in view of the immense issues involved, have also, apprised other statutory authorities concerned with human rights, minorities protection, police training institutions and media bodies and I have also arranged for the matter to enter the public domain as it is an issue of grave public importance, which in a democracy, the people are entitled to know.
26.7 I am doing this at the earliest opportunity. I may be given the permission to cast this petition in a more formal mode if required.
PRAYERS
I pray to this Hon’ble this Hon’ble Court to:
(i) Order an independent commission of inquiry into the conduct of the investigating officers, in the investigation of crucial cases such as have been referred to in these petition;
(ii) Order re-investigation of all the seven terror cases referred herein by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) so that the real culprits can be brought to justice.
(iii) Direct appropriate action against the police officers found responsible for their flagrant violation of constitutional values and fundamental rights.
(iv) Direct consequential relief to the victims of such wrongful and bogus investigations.
Yours truly,
AshishKhetan