Quantcast
Channel: TwoCircles.net - Indian Muslim
Viewing all 4241 articles
Browse latest View live

BJP Minority Morcha leader critical of Congress treatment on Muslims

$
0
0

Abdul Gani, TwoCircles.net,

Guwahati: Supporting Narendra Modi’s candidature for Prime Minister, BJP Minority Morcha national secretary Arshad Alam slammed Congress for using Muslims for vote bank politics. Talking to reporters in Guwahati, the BJP leader said that the corrupted politicians in Congress trying to defame the saffron party at any cost.

“Seeing Narendra Modi’s developmental works in Gujrat the corrupt politicians are sacred across the country. If he becomes the PM the entire country will see the development. The common men of the country have appreciated Modi’s work,” Alam said at the party headquarters in Guwahati.



BJP Minority Morcha National Secretary Arshad Alam addressing a press conference in Guwahati. Photo: Dhruba Jyoti Boro.

Criticizing Congress’ role he said that the ruling party has been using the Muslim community for the sake of votes only and that’s why the condition of Indian Muslims is very poor. “Congress has always been using the people of Muslim community for the sake of votes only. They have never wanted development for the community but BJP wants all round development for every citizen of the country. If we compare the status of Muslims of Gujarat and Assam, everything will be clear,” he added.

He termed Congress as ‘Corporate Company,’ Alam said that the party has many agents in the country to carry out their activities. He even went up to the extent of saying Badruddin Ajmal led All India United Democratic Front (AIUDF) as one of the agents of Congress.

“Badruddin Ajmal is doing his own business here not a political party. He is an agent of the Congress party or how can somebody be a part of UPA (United Progressive Alliance) in centre and opposition in Assam,” he further said.

Comparing Gujarat riot with such clashes in Assam he said that people have seen more bloody clashes during the Congress regime than BJP. On the Ishrat Jahan case he said that the Congress is making it a big issue for their political gain. “There are thousands such cases happen in India. I’m not saying it to be a fake encounter as the investigation is still on. Just because a Muslim name is involved, a controversy is being created,” he said.


Popular Front extends financial help for endo affected families in

$
0
0

By TCN News,

Puttur: Popular Front of India, Kattattar area committee, extended financial help for three endosulfan affected families in north Kerala.

Popular Front Kumbra division president Abubakkar Rizwan distributed financial help for the endo victims Mohammad Ijaz (8), Jamsheer and 5 endo affected children of late Ibrahim and Bibi Jan couple, Shareef, Salim, Ishaq, Reshma and Hanif.



All these families are living in dire poverty.

Popular Front Kattattar area president Shareef, Secretary K.M.Shakeer, Kumbra area secretary Shamsuddeen Eshwaramangila, Razaq Ankattadka, Shareef Ankattadka, K.M.Rafeeq were present on the occasion.

Delhi court defers sentencing in Batla House case till 2 PM tomorrow

$
0
0

By TwoCircles.net Staff Reporter,

New Delhi: The Saket District court today deferred the sentencing of Shahzad Ahmed till 2.0 pm tomorrow in connection with the 2008 Batla House alleged shootout.

On Thursday, Additional Sessions Judge Rajender Kumar Shastri had found Shahzad Ahmed guilty in the Batla House encounter case on charges of obstructing public servants in discharge of duties, murder of Inspector MC Sharma and attempt to murder, and Monday was fixed for the announcement of the quantum of punishment.

Special Public Prosecutor Satwinder Kaur sought death penalty for Shahzad sighting the Citing Supreme Court verdicts in Devenderpal Singh Bhullar and Ajmal Kasab, as few residents of the Paharganj had gathered out seeking death penalty. Paharganj was one of the site, where serial blasts had occurred on September 13, 2008.

Defence counsel Satish Tamta, however, urged the bench for leniency as he only 20 year old at the time of purported crime. The Additional Sessions Judge Rajender Kumar Shastri reserved the order till tomorrow. The quantum of punishment will now be announced tomorrow at 2.00 pm.

In 2008 on 19th September, on 4th floor of L-18, Batla House in Delhi’s Jamia Nagar area, two youths of Azamgarh – Atif Amin and Mohammad Sajid - were killed in a shootout, which was later claimed to be an encounter by special cell of Delhi police. In this shootout, one of the officers of Delhi police Inspector Mohan Chand Sharma also lost his life. However, from the very first day Human and Civil Rights’ organistions and activists are demanding an independent judicial enquiry into the shootout. The postmortem report of the deceased also pointed towards the encounter being a fake one.



File photo of Shahzad Ahmed (Courtesy: The Hindu).

The judgement has come as a big relief to the Delhi Police as the court has accepted the police version of the operation.
Shahzad Ahmed, Special Cell of the Delhi Police, claims was one of the occupants in the L 18 house in the Batla House, where the alleged encounter took place on September 19, 2008, six days after serial blasts in the city. According to the prosecution, he fired at least two rounds and then flee from the scene.

Shahzad had, however, retracted from this police confessions and denied all charges and claimed that he was innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He had denied that he was in the flat at the time of the encounter or that he fired on police. He also told the Additional Sessions Judge that he was picked up by the ATS Lucknow from his house in Azamgarh and that his family had also lodged a complaint for kidnapping
The prosecution, in its final arguments, contended that it had "sufficient circumstantial evidence" and phone records to prove that Ahmad was present in the flat in Batla House.

Shahzad's defence counsel and the civil society groups have been arguing that the L-18 flat in Batla House area has only one exit which was manned by police people; there is no possibility to escape by jumping. Anyone attempting that would only break his bones. Further that the local police was not informed in time and that the FIR was filed very late. They have noted several other loopholes in the police version. The prosecution has not been able to produce any credible evidence against Shahzad that proves his connection with the Indian Mujahedeen.

Dr. Javed Akhtar, President Association for Welfare, Medical, Educational and Legal Assistance (AWMELA), that is fighting the case on behalf of Shahzad has exprssed his “disappointment on the conviction,” but added that after discussing the fine prints of the judgement, they will appeal against the judgement in the High Court.

Related:

Civil rights groups dismayed and disappointed at Batla House judgement

Batla house judgement: Questions remain as court accepts police version and their explanations too

Dr. Zakir Naik to get Islamic Personality of the Year award in Dubai

$
0
0

By TCN News

Dubai: Famous Islamic debater Dr. Zakir Naik has been conferred the Dubai International Holy Quran Award for the Islamic Personality of the Year 1434 Hijri.

The award will be given at a special ceremony at the Dubai Chamber of Commerce tonight.

The award was initially announced for Grand Imam of Al Azhar Dr. Sheikh Ahmed Al Tayyeb but due to unrest in Egypt the organizing committee decided to honor him in future and instead chose Dr. Zakir Naik.

Dr. Zakir Naik is the founder of Islamic Research Foundation and Peace TV, a 24-hour channel that features talks by Islamic preachers.

The proposed NRC modalities: Passport to another violence in Assam

$
0
0

By Abdul Kalam Azad for TwoCircles.net,

On 12 July’ 2013, Jaydeep Shukla, Extra Assistant Commissioner to Government of Assam submitted the additional affidavit in Supreme Court of India on Writ Petition (Civil) No. 274/2009 filed by Assam Public Works, regarding updation of National Register of Citizen (NRC). The additional affidavit is more of dictation by AASU (All Assam Students Union) then any submission of a democratic government of an Indian state. AASU submitted their suggestions on May 21, 2013 opposing the earlier affidavit given by government of Assam and held a meeting with the group of Ministers to discuss the modalities and Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) on July 4, 2013. The government accepted the recommendations made by AASU. The modified modalities and SOP (Standard Operating Procedure) have incorporated some perilous clauses and deleted some basic ethics and democratic values.

Surprisingly, no other organizations were invited to the meeting, not even the representatives of AAMSU (All Assam Minority Students Union), whereas they were present in such meeting before preparing the earlier affidavit.

What are in this additional affidavit?

Clause 4(b) of the additional affidavit outlines that there would be no house to house enumeration, only application forms will be distributed house to house though government machinery. This affidavit also deleted the last two lines of introductory para of earlier affidavit “the Citizenship (Registration of Citizen and Issue of National Identity Cards) Rule, 2003 prescribed for house to house enumeration of all the households as done in case of population census or in the intensive revision electoral rule” vide clause 5 (i). The point 7 of SOP submitted earlier “Distribution of forms and house to house enumeration” also deleted by clause 5 (ii) and inserted “Inviting application from the head of the family”. The new modalities outlined that the forms will be available at circle office too.

Question arises, why AASU is interested to delete the clause ‘house to house enumeration’? Is updation of NRC is not an intensive work? Does not it seem to be seriously important? The affidavit says that forms will be distributed through government machinery. If government machinery can distribute the forms house to house, why can’t enumerate house to house?

Or the house to house distribution will remain in black and white and in practical the citizen will have to collect it from circle office? Imagine, what hurdles will have to face by the people of the char areas, where there are no roads, boot is the only means of communication, where one week’s travelling will be required to collect the form from circle office! Whereas, in case of any other states such updation always done through house to house enumeration.

The expertise of AASU does not end here. The affidavit also clearly mentions that there will be no provision of any facilitator! Where more than half of the population is illiterate and they are being asked to fill up their application forms from their own? Doesn’t it put a serious question mark on AASU’s inner intention?

Clause 4(c) of the additional affidavit says that the ‘D’ voters can apply for inclusion of their name in the updated NRC. But they would be finally included in the NRC, only when they are declared as non foreigner by Foreigners Tribunal. Even though they have sufficient documents to get registered their names in updated NRC. Doesn’t this provision violet the basic tenet of Indian judiciary? They will be treated as guilty until they are proven innocent (not innocent until proven guilty!). If we look at the conviction rate of ‘D’ voters, it is found that the conviction rate is very low. Total 55184 ‘D’ voter cases were registered between 1985 to 2012 (July), out of 55184 only 6590 were declared as foreigners. The conviction rate is 8.37%. That means more than 91% of those ‘D’ voters were genuine Indian citizen and were illegally harassed. And if we link it up to the proposed modalities that more than 91% of ‘D’ voter’s name will not be included in the updated NRC with out their fault! The additional affidavit also clarifies that the pending cases at Foreigners Tribunal will not affect the implementation of NRC updation. Doesn’t it alternatively say that we are not bothered about your sufferings?

Another crucial clause is incorporated in the affidavit, which indicates that if somebody’s name is not included (not satisfied with the outcome), will have to appeal through Foreigners Tribunal only and that also within 60days of such rejection. The option of tagging competent civil court might be there, which by virtue of its competency could direct the government to pay compensation to victim if rejected illegally. But in case of only Foreigners Tribunal, the judge will not hold such power to direct the authority to pay compensation. Interestingly, this appeal process will also not link up to the NRC updation process.

Point (g) of the annexed modalities along with the additional affidavit says, “...However, persons who are originally inhabitants of Assam and their children and descendants, who are citizens of India ab initio, shall be included in the consolidated list if the citizenship of such persons is beyond reasonable doubt and to the full satisfaction of the registering authority.” Doesn’t it summarily mean that the registering authority can add any name if they wish to do so? What is the reason behind this absolute power to authority? Is this represents any of our democratic values?
A legitimate doubt comes to mind, whether AASU really wants to update the NRC or trying to keep the issue alive to keep themselves in the limelight; otherwise why they are providing such dangerous, non viable and peculiar suggestions?

Why Congress government is playing with NRC?

If we closely observe the recent political developments in Assam, it becomes very clear that Chief Minister Tarun Gogoi is taking some non conventional decision to be in power in the next term also. After the violence in BTAD and RHAC, the result of the panchayat poll has shown that Congress has lost ground in the minority belt. At the same time AIUDF has been becoming invincible in that belt. On the other hand BJP’s rise in the municipal election has actually threatened Congress. Gogoi is ready to change the role of the game. It seems that his nod to ULFA’s demand to declare Assam as a tribal state or accepting the suggestion of AASU on NRC updation blindly are the part of his greater political plan. He has to prove that he is more pro-nationalist than declining AGP or Sarbananda Sonowal. No doubt his power thrust may bring another bloodshed in Assam.

Why AIUDF is silent spectator?

In recent times, AIUDF is getting a boost politically after every clash or violence with minorities of the state. Be it 2010’s police firing at Barpeta or BTAD violence in 2012. If the NRC updation is preceded with the current modalities another violence can’t be avoided by any means. For a political gain AIUDF’s silence may be quite natural. Otherwise do you see any reason behind this epic silence?

(Abdul Kalam Azad is a Post Graduate student at Tata Institute of Social Sciences.)

Hundreds attend iftar organized by Human Chain

$
0
0

By TCN News

New Delhi: Delhi based non-government society Human Chain organised Iftaar at Jamat-e-Islami complex in Abul Fazal Enclave this Saturday. The Iftaar followed by dinner was intended to have a get-together for the people of Seemanchal area in Bihar and neighbouring Uttar Dinajpur district of West Bengal. At least 700 people attended the event organised by the society formed by the working professionals and students from different districts of Seemanchal. Along with students, professionals, activists, the Iftaar was attended by politicians like Dr Shakeel-Uz-Zaman Ansari, Secretary, All India Congress Committee and congress leader Shakeel Ahmad Khan.



Mohammad Aslam, President Human Chain said, “with the aim to bring the people of Seemanchal area to interact with each other, we had organised the Iftaar and Dinner in the holy month of Ramadan. Alhamdolilah the event of our society remained very successful and the people have appreciated the Iftaar and Dinner organised by Human Chain.” “In busy life of Delhi where people hardly get time to meet each other, the Iftaar organised by Human Chain provided a wonderful chance to pass a good time in Islamic way. The Iftaar and Dinner intended for interaction generated bonhomie among the people who have attended the function, ” mentioned Aslam.

Human Chain members Mujahid Akhtar Naaz, Minnat Rahmani, Tarique Sufyan, Mohammad Mudassir Alam, Salam Anwar, Nasim Haider, Tauqueer Alam, Harish Marwan, Ghaznafar Elahi, Sarwar Alam, Ghulam Tarique, Shah Azam, Raghib Ahsan, Mokarram Zia, Dilshad Alam, Munis Janesar and others have thanked the people to attend the Iftaar and Dinner, and making the event successful.



Human Chain KSA (Kingdom of Saudi Arabia) Chapter President Asif Daudi was present during the event. He said, “I am overwhelmed over being the part of this organization and the arrangements made by the local team is praiseworthy.” Further he added, “I was following the activities of Human Chain online on Facebook and over phone, for the first time I had physically attended the event of the society and it exceeded by expectations.” Mumtaz Naiyer, the NRI member of Human Chain based out in London (United Kingdom) has congratulated Human Chain on successfully organizing the Iftaar and Dinner.

UP Congress iftar on Aug 1

$
0
0

By TwoCircles.net Staff Reporter,

The Uttar Pradesh Congress Committee (UPCC) will organise iftar party on 22nd Ramzan i.e. 1 August, Thursday. The iftar will be organised at Nehru Bhawan. Special arrangements has been done for offering Namaz.

Earlier, the Congress had planned its iftar on 21st Ramzan. But since it is the martyrdom of Hazrat Ali, it was changed. Maulana Yasoob Abbas, the spokesperson of All India Shia Personal Law Board lodged his protest over the date.



Maulana Yasoob Abbas meeting Nirmal Khatri

UPCC president Nirmal Khatri who is also MP agreed and changed the date of iftar. The invitation card of the iftar was changed and the new date and day was written by pen.

Ramadan 1434: Family

$
0
0

By Swastik Pal, TwoCircles.net

Arabarul Haque, aged 60, and Rehana Begum wait to have iftar with the entire family at a residence near Khiderpore, Kolkata.


Rate of joblessness shows downward trend among Muslims

$
0
0

The community still far lags behind other communities in the country.

By M Reyaz, TwoCircles.net,

New Delhi: Rate of joblessness shows a downward trend among Muslims, although their per capita spending is still lowest, according to the latest data of the government.

The National Sample Survey Organization (NSSO) has put out a new report on employment trends for religious groups, based on its 2009-10 survey, called Employment and Unemployment Situation among Major Religious Groups in India.



Unemployment in both rural and urban areas is interestngly marginally falling from 2.3% in 2004-05 to 1.9% in 2009-10 among Muslims in villages and from 4.1% to 3.2% in urban centres during the last five-year period. However, most of them are self-employed. In urban India, the proportion of households with major source of earnings as self-employment was also highest for Muslims (46 per cent), followed by Sikhs.

According to this study, among urban males, proportion of workers with level of education secondary and above is lowest among Muslims with only 30 per cent, while it is 58 % for both Christians and Sikhs and 56% for Hindus.

Among urban male with level of education secondary and above, the worker population ratio (WPR) was highest for Hindus (70 per cent), followed by Sikhs (68 per cent). The corresponding WPRs for Christians and Muslims were 67 per cent and 65 per cent, respectively.

For both rural and urban India, average monthly per capita household consumer expenditure (MPCE) was the highest for Sikh households, followed by Christians and Hindus. At the all-India level, the average MPCE of Sikh household was Rs. 1659 while that for Muslim household was Rs. 980.

The average household size, in both rural and urban areas, for Muslims was higher than those of other religious groups, and the average household size was the lowest among Christians. The household size in rural areas was higher than that of urban areas for each of the religious groups.



The proportion of households belonging to the household type rural labour was the highest among Muslims (about 41 per cent). About 43 per cent of Christian households, 38 per cent of Muslim households and 37 per cent of Hindu households cultivated more than or equal to 0.001 hectare of land but less than 1.00 hectare of land. The proportion of households cultivating more than 4.00 hectares of land was the highest for Sikhs (6 per cent), followed by Hindus (3 per cent).

Unemployment was highest amongst the Sikhs living in urban centres. The major source of earnings from regular wage/salaried was the highest for Christians households (43 per cent) in urban areas.

According to this study, the unemployment rate in rural areas is less than that of urban areas.

The survey was spread over 7402 villages and 5252 urban blocks covering 100957 households (59129 in rural areas and 41828 in urban areas) and enumerating 459784 persons (281327 in rural areas and 178457 in urban areas). In this survey information on religion followed by each household was collected as part of the household characteristics. The reported religion of head of the household was considered as the religion of all the household members irrespective of the actual religion followed by individual members.

Batla House shootout: Court to pronounce verdict Tuesday

$
0
0

By IANS,

New Delhi: A Delhi court Tuesday will decide the fate of Shahzad Ahmad, lone convict and a suspected Indian Mujahideen (IM) operative in the 2008 Batla House shootout case.

The prosecution has sought death penalty for Ahmad saying it is the "rarest of rare case".

Additional Sessions Judge Rajender Kumar Shastri, who convicted the 24-year-old man from Azamgarh in Uttar Pradesh for killing Delhi Police Special Cell Inspector M.C. Sharma in the shootout, will pronounce the verdict.

The court after hearing arguments of the prosecution and the defence had reserved the verdict on the punishment for the convict for Tuesday.

The prosecution, while seeking death penalty for Ahmad, 24, told the court that the accused killed Sharma and injured head constables Balwant Singh and Rajbir Singh while they were performing their duty, so he be given death penalty.

It added that while awarding any punishment, the court should also take into account the pain of inspector Sharma's family.

The shootout between a Delhi Police Special Cell team and alleged IM operatives occurred Sep 19, 2008, days after serial blasts rocked the national capital Sep 13.

Ahmad was said to be present in house number L-8 in Jamia Nagar in south Delhi where the shootout took place.

The court July 25 held Ahmad guilty of assaulting police officials and obstructing them from doing their duty.

He was convicted of offences that included murder and attempt to murder which carry a death penalty as the maximum sentence.

Telangana and the Muslim question with MIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi

$
0
0

By Mohd. Ismail Khan, TwoCircles.net,

Hyderabad: Andhra Pradesh is counting its last nights, India’s oldest statehood movement has finally jolted Indian National Congress and its political calculations. As Telangana or in Delhi political catalogue as Rayal-Telangana or a Hyderabad State appears to be a certainty, standing just next to the corner of new arena of south Indian politics, there is one party which begs to differ.

The grand old party of Deccan Majlis-e-Itehadul Muslimeen (MIM) has up their ante against any move to bifurcate Andhra Pradesh, MIM president Asaduddin Owaisi has emerged as passionate protagonist of United Andhra Pradesh more so from his counterparts in Seema Andhra.

This new found fervor against any move to divide the state according to MIM is to protect the Muslim interest. TwoCircles.net spoke with MIM President and Member of Parliament from Hyderabad Mr. Asaduddin Owaisi on his reservations for a separate Telangana state and impact of a decision which Muslim political leadership is taking against the popular mood in the region.



Excerpts from the Interview:

TCN: You are opposing any move to bifurcate Andhra Pradesh so vehemently; it has become more aggressive sine past 2 weeks. What do you think will be the immediate threats to Muslims and minorities in general if Telangana or Rayal-Telangana for that matter is formed?

AO: If the state is bifurcated the only political beneficiary to get out of this bifurcation unfortunately will be the BJP, and it will become strong over here. Secondly the biggest loser will be Congress and the Telugu Desam Party. TDP will lose ground over here badly as once they will be called an Andhra Party. TRS was formed with one point agenda, what will be their utility if Telangana is formed, and who will be benefited by the political vacuum which will be created.

TDP brought up its workers in anti-Congress wave, and people who joined TRS is in away the same, so this political vacuum will be filled naturally by the BJP.

Third point is, those court cases against 4-5 % reservation provided to Muslims in AP , all those cases were filed by people who live in Telangana. This itself shows their mentality. I am not saying in a democratic country you don’t have the right to challenge a Government order, but I am telling this to show these are the people who will go over there.

Fourth point is, you have reported also in your website, that 8-9 months ago in Mahbubnagar by-election where TRS Muslim candidate lost to BJP. What more proof do you want on what I am saying, that itself corroborate what I have been saying.

As a political party this will help me, but community has to pay a huge cost. In case if BJP becomes powerful and gets relevance in this region, then we know their programs and measures which they adopt. That is why we are opposing it.

TCN: So the rise of the BJP will be the major threat to the Muslims in the region?

AO: Of course and rise of those elements who doesn’t believe in the secular ethos of this country.

TCN: Suppose if Congress doesn’t take any decision before this next Parliament session, due to the pressure building up by protagonists of United Andhra like you. Narendra Modi is going to address a widely publicized BJP rally in Hyderabad, imagine if he promises, ‘give us votes, we will give Telangana’ than any how BJP will rise?

AO: See you and I don’t have the knowledge of unforeseen, and BJP want smaller states throughout India, because they know that they can’t grow in larger states. Take for example Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand, BJP got power there. So how do you fight BJP, because BJP is promising something and before they do it we will do it. BJP is saying we will build Ram Mandir would secular parties build Ram Mandir to stop BJP?



MIM President Asaduddin Owaisi

TCN: But if Congress takes a decision…?

AO: No, if your argument is right, then will you say BJP is saying if they come to power they will build Ram Mandir, will we allow to build a Ram Mandir then? BJP still has not left abolition of article 370 and imposition of uniform civil code (from their agenda). Will we impose uniform civil code because (if not done) BJP will come to power?

See, whole thing is, this is not the way to fight a communal party like BJP. You have to fight them on our issues and principles. (This way) before fighting them you are conceding the war to them.

TCN: It has been consistent stand of MIM since 1960’s that it is against separate Telangana state. But in your submission to Sri Krishna Committee you did state that if Andhra Pradesh have to be divided than Greater Telangana (Rayal-Telangana) should be formed. That point of time people thought it was something impossible, but now when UPA is likely to take the same decision you should have taken it as your vindication?

AO: No, if you read that report, and if you read the questionnaire provided to political parties, that questionnaire asked us, No. 1) what is your stand on the bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh?, second question was what are the other options which you can give us? In that option we asked for whole of Rayalseema not just these two districts (Anantapur and Kurnool). And the conclusion was, we stand for united Andhra and we are against bifurcation and in no uncertain terms Hyderabad should be made a union territory. This is what mentioned by us in the report please read it. It is convenient for people to do cut and paste job, I am telling you these are the facts which we mentioned in the Sri Krishna report.

TCN: In Delhi situation seems to be like, on Rayal-Telangana Congress has made up its mind. Now if Rayal-Telangana is going to be a reality than shouldn’t the Muslim leadership and as the party which represents interest of Muslims in Andhra Pradesh should be lobbying for special measures for the community?

AO: For which Muslims?

TCN: For Muslims of both the states, in case Andhra Pradesh gets divided.

AO: When I am saying united Andhra I am looking into Muslims living everywhere, now if I take up the call of Muslims living in this region that you will ask what about Muslims living in that region. That is why we are of the opinion that interest of the Muslims and secularism will be best served in united Andhra Pradesh.

God knows what will happen in future if such an eventuality arises…of course we have a responsibility and inshallah we will raise up to our responsibility.

TCN: Telangana issue is not something which Congress has just decided to concede, there has been a history behind it, and there have been popular movements on this demand. You represent Muslim community, when people in this state see you they perceive you as Muslim leadership, when you are opposing this (demand), people of Telangana will see Muslims as traitors to the Movement. So don’t you think it will create trouble for Muslims living in villages and districts?

AO: I am, surprised with your question! According to many people I am (Muslims) a traitor already, irrespective of Telangana or not. How can I stop them from calling any names? We are living in a democracy and I have every right to hold an opinion, and I will continue to hold an opinion. When I leave this world on the day of judgment, Allah will decide based on my intentions and what I have done, history will decide.

See it (separate Telangana) has been in my political interest and I would have said yes, smaller state make sense to me, 119 seats (in the assembly), 7 MLAs (of MIM) and I can increase the strength, I will have more bargaining power, but what price community have to pay and let history will judge.

My intentions are only for the community (interest) and Allah knows it, so...I don’t care they call me traitor or what, I mean please tell me and make me understand in 112 seats of Telangana (excluding 7 hold by MIM) there is not a single Muslim MLA, why didn’t they elect me, because I am a traitor? You have 17 Lok sabha seats but you have only one Muslim M.P. (himself), why didn’t you elect me? You prove me wrong you and get them elected. You don’t want to elect from your party tickets and then you blame me. You don’t want to vote for us, you don’t tolerate our political rise; you don’t want political Muslim voice that is why all this arguments are created, ‘if you don’t support what will happen to them’? Why seven Muslims were killed in Vatoli (Adilabad), burned alive. Why did they do that in 2008?

TCN: But won’t Rayal-Telangana be a better bargain than just Telangana, it can create a buffer for communal forces?

AO: It’s not a question of bargain; you are not going out there and buying tomatoes and potatoes. You are talking about a state, please understand Muslims suffered when state (Nizam state) was trifurcated, some went to Maharashtra and to Karnataka, we were divided, you are again dividing us now.

How will it help me? How will I speak on behalf of a poor Muslim living in Srikakulam district on the border of Orissa? In this DNA age where communalism is rising everywhere, how do we take up the cause of Muslim community that itself is a huge challenge, and how do you represent them in things like education, jobs, security, this are the things which is in front of me and basing on this things I feel that our issues will be addressed in a best possible way in this way (united Andhra), and if things don’t go according to my plan, than inshallah Allah has something (planned) and things will turn out good for us, but as far as I am concerned this are my issues and this is my stand, ok let people judge me on it.

TCN: There are Muslim intellectuals who are protagonists of separate Telangana state, they argues that if separate state is formed than Muslims will have numerical advantage, their percentage will increase, therefore their political clout will also increase?

AO: Anyway I don’t want to comment on such people, who have not fought any single election in their life.

TCN: So you don’t endorse their view?

AO: In this DNA age, everyone is an expert in politics, apart from me (giggles). Everyone is an expert in electoral politics, so I rest my case, when people full of wisdom have their opinion what can I say.

TCN: If Congress went ahead and form Rayal-Telangana and in worst case scenario turn Hyderabad into a union territory, what will be the course of action of MIM?

AO: Hyderabad can never be a union territory, because Telangana has been a hinterland of Hyderabad. Hyderabad doesn’t have any geographical contiguity as Chandigarh has with Punjab and Haryana. I don’t see any rhyme and reason where you can make Hyderabad a union territory. Will this be acceptable for those protagonist for separate Telangana. Let us assume what you are saying is right, than where will the revenue come for the new state? Do you know 80,000 crore is being paid from Hyderabad and surrounding areas to central and state Government as taxes, and not even 5-10% taxes comes from other parts of Telangana. Can a new state survive without Hyderabad; it is for those people who are fighting (for separate state) to understand what I am saying. And we (MIM) will in no uncertain terms accept Hyderabad as UT.

TCN: What will be your course of action if it happens?

AO: You will see what we will do.

Rahman to go on India road tour this October

$
0
0

By IANS,

Mumbai: Legendary composer, singer and songwriter A.R. Rahman is all set for his India road tour "Rahmanishq" in October, the first such event in two decades.

The tour will be encompass cities like Kolkata, Visakhapatnam, Jaipur and Ahmedabad. A concert will also be held in Sydney in August.

Rahman is very excited about the concert.

"It will be an experience of music, great production, joy and fun," he said at a press conference on "Rahmanishq" here Monday.

Talking about the cities selected for the tour, Rahman said: "I always wanted to go to cities you usually don't think of. You generally think of Delhi, Mumbai...the idea was to meet fans in these cities".

On the event coming after 20 years, he said that this is the right time to have it now.

"Everything has a right time. It is so good that this is happening now. Three years back I didn't even know my future," he said.

Rahman will also be joined by other singers like Javed Ali, Neeti Mohan, Shweta Pandit, and Harshdeep Kaur among others during the tour. The singers also joined the press conference through video conferencing of press meets held simultaneously in Ahmedabad and Kolkata.

Build pressure on Modi regime, Rahul tells Gujarat Congress

$
0
0

By IANS,

New Delhi: Congress vice president Rahul Gandhi has asked party leaders from Gujarat to build pressure on the Narendra Modi government by strongly raising issues concerning people, party sources said Monday.

They said that Gandhi told senior party leaders from Gujarat including Arjun Modhwadia and Shankarsinh Vaghela to forcefully raise issues which will build pressure on the Modi government.

Gandhi is also leant to have discussed agitational programmes with Gujarat leaders.

He also asked the party leaders to inform people about the welfare programmes of the central government, the sources said.

Modi has been named chief of campaign committee by the Bharatiya Janata Party for the 2014 Lok Sabha elections and is expected to spend a lot of time outside Gujarat in run up to the general elections.

The Congress is keen to stem any wave of support in Modi's favour in the state if he is projected prime ministerial candidate by the BJP.

Trinamool sweeps Bengal panchayat polls, mauls LF

$
0
0

By IANS,

Kolkata: West Bengal's ruling Trinamool Congress romped towards a massive victory in the rural polls, regarded as a curtain raiser to the next general elections and the biggest test of Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee's popularity since she came to power in 2011.

The Trinamool has won or is on the verge of winning majority of the gram panchayats and the panchayat samilties (the lowest and the middle levels, respectively, of the three-tier rural council system) in 12 of the 17 districts of the state.

In the panchayat samities, the Trinamool's success story was more spectacular, as it was winning over 70 percent of the bodies overall, in contrast to about 60 percent in the gram panchayats.

As per latest results, the Trinamool had claimed 163 of the 225 samities, with the opposition Left Front bagging 51. The Congress got only 19. Some of the samities returned hung verdicts.

With counting almost over in the gram panchayats and majority of panchayat samities, the Mamata magic seems to be intact in bulk of the districts, notwithstanding the Sarada chit fund case, and other controversies which has dogged her government.

The Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPI-M)-led Left Front, which had established its dominance in 13 districts in the previous elections held in 2008, suffered huge losses, particularly in south Bengal.

But it managed to do better in some of the northern districts, mainly benefiting from a triangular contest with the Trinamool cutting into the traditional bases of the Congress.

The LF finished as the single largest combination in the gram panchayats of Jalpaiguri district, and led in the samities. It also came up with a good show in Murshidabad, Malda and North Dinajpur districts, for long strongholds of the Congress.

Nadia district was seeing a close fight between the Trinamool and the LF, with the former in the lead in the gram panchayats, and the latter moving ahead in the samities. The Congress, which emerged third, seemed to have spoiled the Trinamool's party in the district.

The Congress bagged more than half of the gram panchayats in its citadel Murshidabad, but finished second in the panchayat samities.

However, in a tough three-way race with the Trinamool and the Left Front, the party slipped in its other strongholds Malda and North Dinajpur where it was running the zilla parishads for the last five years.

The Trinamool was far ahead of its rivals in its belt of south Bengal, where it was picking up an overwhelming number of gram panchyats in nine of the ten districts, except Nadia.

The Trinamool also maintained its stranglehold over Singur of Hooghly district and East Midnapore's Nandigram, two rural areas where sustained and often violent farmers' protests led by the party against the then LF government's bid to acquire agricultural land for industries had scripted its resurgence in the state culminating in the assembly polls victory in 2011.

The LF, which was hoping for revival of its fortunes in some of the districts, suffered rude jolts in the former red forts of Burdwan, Bankura, Birbhum, North 24 Parganas, West Midnapore, Cooch Behar and Hooghly.

The massive democratic exercise with 1.69 lakh candidates in the fray - around 90,000 of them women - has 58,865 seats up for grabs.

The counting has just started for the zilla parishad seats.In 2008, the LF conquered 13 zilla parishads, followed by Congress and the Trinamool with two each.

Happy over the outcome, Banerjee dedicated the win to the people.

"People in the state have got back democracy through the panchayat polls.I dedicate this victory to the rural population of the state. It is the victory of Maa Maati Manush (Mother, Land and People)."

On the other hand, LF chairman Biman Bose accused the Trinamool of conspiring with the police and some State Election Commission officials in carrying out rampant irregularities in the vote count.

Incidentally, the Trinamool won over 6,000 seats uncontested.

At least 24 people were killed during the five phased polls which began July 11, but no untoward incident, according to police, has taken place yet during counting.

Shahzad given life term in Batla House case

$
0
0

By TwoCircles.net Staff Reporter,

New Delhi: The Saket District court today sentenced Shahzad Ahmed for life in the 2008 Batla House alleged encounter case. Additionally a fine of Rs 95,000 has also been imposed on him; Rs. 40,000 of which would go to the family of MC Sharma and Rs 20,000 to Head Constable Balwant Singh, who was injured in the encounter.

On Monday, Additional Sessions Judge Rajender Kumar Shastri had reserved his judgment on quantum of punishment after hearing argument from both sides.
On Thursday, the court had found Shahzad Ahmed guilty in the Batla House encounter case on charges of obstructing public servants in discharge of duties, murder of Inspector MC Sharma and attempt to murder, and Monday was fixed for the announcement of the quantum of punishment.



File photo of Shahzad Ahmed (Courtesy: The Hindu).

Special Public Prosecutor Satwinder Kaur sought death penalty for Shahzad citing the Supreme Court verdicts in Devenderpal Singh Bhullar and Ajmal Kasab, as few residents of the Paharganj had gathered out seeking death penalty. Paharganj was one of the site, where serial blasts had occurred on September 13, 2008.

Defence counsel Satish Tamta, however, urged the bench for leniency as he only 20 year old at the time of purported crime. The Additional Sessions Judge Rajender Kumar Shastri reserved the order till tomorrow.

The court had pointed out ill-preparedness of the raiding party while announcing the conviction.

In 2008 on 19th September, on 4th floor of L-18, Batla House in Delhi’s Jamia Nagar area, two youths of Azamgarh – Atif Amin and Mohammad Sajid - were killed in a shootout, which was later claimed to be an encounter by special cell of Delhi police. In this shootout, one of the officers of Delhi police Inspector Mohan Chand Sharma also lost his life. However, from the very first day Human and Civil Rights’ organizations and activists are demanding an independent judicial enquiry into the shootout. The postmortem report of the deceased also pointed towards the encounter being a fake one.
he judgement has come as a big relief to the Delhi Police as the court has accepted the police version of the operation.
Shahzad Ahmed, Special Cell of the Delhi Police, claims was one of the occupants in the L 18 house in the Batla House, where the alleged encounter took place on September 19, 2008, six days after serial blasts in the city. According to the prosecution, he fired at least two rounds and then flee from the scene.

Shahzad had, however, retracted from this police confessions and denied all charges and claimed that he was innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He had denied that he was in the flat at the time of the encounter or that he fired on police. He also told the Additional Sessions Judge that he was picked up by the ATS Lucknow from his house in Azamgarh and that his family had also lodged a complaint for kidnapping
The prosecution, in its final arguments, contended that it had "sufficient circumstantial evidence" and phone records to prove that Ahmad was present in the flat in Batla House.

Shahzad's defence counsel and the civil society groups have been arguing that the L-18 flat in Batla House area has only one exit which was manned by police people; there is no possibility to escape by jumping. Anyone attempting that would only break his bones. Further that the local police was not informed in time and that the FIR was filed very late. They have noted several other loopholes in the police version. The prosecution has not been able to produce any credible evidence against Shahzad that proves his connection with the Indian Mujahedeen.

Dr. Javed Akhtar, President Association for Welfare, Medical, Educational and Legal Assistance (AWMELA), that is fighting the case on behalf of Shahzad has exprssed his “disappointment on the conviction,” but added that after discussing the fine prints of the judgement, they will appeal against the judgement in the High Court.

Related:

Civil rights groups dismayed and disappointed at Batla House judgement

Batla house judgement: Questions remain as court accepts police version and their explanations too


Poll 2014 - A Manifesto from the Margins

$
0
0

By John Dayal

A decade and a half into the 21st Century, India struggles in meeting simple needs of life for a vast majority of its people, variously estimated at 600 to 800 million of its population of 1.20 billion. It hovers at the bottom of the international list on human indices, human rights violations and disempowerment of the people on the margins.

A constitutional democracy by law, it however shares traits with the worst dictatorships in the anti people ethos of its police and security forces rooted deep in the country’s past as the subject state of an imperial order, and in the lethargy, incompetence and elitist tenor of its criminal justice system. Neoliberalism and the imposition of International Monetary Fund and World Bank dictated economic policies have left the poor untouched, increased the gulf between the haves and the have-nots, and plugged India into the meltdown that has afflicted the United States and Europe in the last one decade.Corruption nullifies whatever good may have been generated from the few social initiatives taken in the 65 years of Independence.

India today stands divided into two unequal halves – the super rich five per cent of the population and the now 300 million so called middle class well-off people aspiring to a global life style on the one hand, and the farmers, industrial labour, millions of unemployed educated, landless peasantry, Tribals and Dalits on the other. The gulf is widening. And with it, there is anguish and anger of the powerless, which occasionally bursts out, only to be repressed, crushed and defeated with brutal state power. Social groups have been beaten into submission, trade unions have been disemboweled, and even the Church has been cowed into submission by arrogant misuse of regulations. Peaceful assemblies are disallowed and dissent is treated as rebellion. The princely states were abolished when the Union was formed after Independence, but feudalism is alive and well in India. The incomplete land reforms in the 1950s and 1960s have left countryside replete with the dispossessed while a smaller number of big landlords are rich and powerful enough to dominate even the political environment in several states. Combined with patriarchy in such society, parallel systems of justice such as the Khap Panchayats have evolved.

The abolition of untouchability outlawed the most pernicious practices of the caste system, and ensued a modicum of self-respect and protection for the Dalits, or at least those of them that were defined by the Scheduled Castes and Tribes legislation. But that effectively kept out Christians and Muslims whose origins were in the Dalits. The evolution of the Panchayati Raj system should have brought another ray of hope to these people, giving them grassroots political power, but surrogate leadership by the upper castes and a great intolerance to genuine Dalit leadership, specially among women, has led to much bloodshed.

Economic growth has fallen to a decade low of 5%, while industrial output has slowed to a 20-year low of 1% in 2012 and exports have slumped. Food price inflation is still high, over double-digits in recent months. Flagship schemes like MGNREGS are lagging sharply behind targets adding to the economic burdens of the poor. The corporate sector, pampered beyond belief, has repeatedly sought to coerce governments and political parties into doing its will. Using the clout of its money, it has diverted popular anger against corruption, for instance, into a blackmail of governments, using a compliant, complicit media for the purpose. The media has had little option, as much of it, especially the powerful television networks and the major newspapers, are owned directly by the national and corporate groups, and often by international interests through Financial Direct Investment instruments.

The corporate sector is not just dictating policy, it is now bold enough to dictate who will be prime minister, or chief minister. The corporate sector’s assault on the rights of the poor, specially of marginal farmers and the Tribals is apparent in the usurping of not just their farmlands, as in Bengal and Maharashtra, but their very homes in the forests of Orissa, Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh for mining, power plants and special economic or export zones. In the guise of development, large-scale displacement has been enforced. As is now the norm, protests have been met with vendetta, oppression and state violence on people seeking ownership over their own land, their forests, and their water. Ironically, the saturation of mobile phones is more than houses or jobs.

Hyper-nationalism and a perverted patriotism have overwhelmed civil space. In this environment communal groups thrive unbridled. Their poisonous ideology permeates major politician groups, and has successfully infiltrated even self-styled secular political parties and groups. With the State behind them, communal elements have targetted Muslims and Christians in particular, branding them as anti-nationals and aliens. While entire communities are labeled and stigmatized, innocent Muslim youth have been specific targets, arrested without reason, tortured in jail and occasionally liquidated in fake encounters in several states. Many remain in jail without trial.

India’s election system should have been an opportunity to change this ugly reality. But money power, muscle power, rampant illegal electoral practices, caste considerations have been unabashedly used to effectively disenfrenchise the marginalised and the poor. Their vote is coerced, their numbers exploited. Elections have repeatedly brought anti socials and criminals to power, given governance into the hands of the venal and the communal. Parliament and State assemblies have been reduced to rubber stamps legislating laws and policies dictated by vested interests, with no time or thought to devising social schemes, welfare safety nets and health insurance. The demand for a right to food, to livelihood and to a roof is chocked into silence. But the poor do not lose hope. They continue to believe in democracy, and to hope that the General elections are the only way to effectively changed situation, whatever times it takes. They know their day will surely come. They know their strength despite the overwhelming and depressing odds stacked against them. They were the backbone, they know, of the Freedom Struggle, providing the manpower to the movement to break the shackles of colonialism. Such indeed is the history of rebellions and freedom movements across the world. They are the movements of the Poor, even if the titular leaders and figureheads make their way into the history books. It needs be remembered that the corporate sector and the princes and landlords sided with the colonial masters till the last day.

This belief of the poor in democracy, this over all commitment to peaceful means for change and this refusal to remain silent, makes the General elections so important even if there is an undertone of frustration and just a hint of cynicism in the educated and the working class among them. The agenda list, the demands, the hopes and the aspirations, are not in an order of importance. Each one of them is equally important. These are not strands, but the fabric of a needed safety net in the country whose Constitution claims it to be a “secular, socialist republic”.

This, then, is a 25-point People’s Manifesto from the Margins:

1. The Right to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. Despite the first guarantee of the Constitution, this is not implemented either in letter or in spirit. The governments over the years have come to believe that is a right that can be ignored when it suits them. It is not a matter of abolishing the death penalty, which must be done forthwith, but of realizing that human life is sacrosanct and cannot be subject to the whims, fancies or imagined fears of the state. Illegal encounters, torture and the brutalities of hired goons as much as state security forces, have made a mockery of the universal right. Political parties contesting the election must commit themselves to an end to the regime of impunity, extrajudicial killing, incarceration and disappearances.

2. The right to Food is part of the right to Life. Crores of tonnes of food grains rot in godowns while parts of the country face a famine situation, and the very poor cannot even afford to Re 1 per kilo dole that some state governments want to give. There must be a comprehensive Right to Food Law in the country so that no Indian goes to bed hungry, that there is no death because if malnourishment. This must be made possible without hiding behind excuses that farmers will not get remunerative prices if a Food Bill is implemented.

3. The right to a livelihood and the payment of minimum wages to MGNREGA workers as directed by various courts of law. Even after decades, government has not been able to either create or ensure sufficient jobs for the people, specially for the youth both in urban areas as well as in the villages. A comprehensive employment policy is required. Rural areas need to be developed to create employment potential. This will itself be a major engine for economic growth, which is holistic, and envelopes those so far left out. There must be a universal policy on how to bring relief to both urban and rural unemployed. The urban unemployed have been almost entirely left out of government’s reckoning. There is need to evolve a suitable urban employment and self-employment scheme. In rural areas, Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Scheme was supposed to bring relief. Lack of penetration into remote areas, rampant corruption and arbitrariness, lackadaisical attitude by state and district administration; have severely impacted on the scheme. The rates of payment are ridiculously low considering that the scheme guarantees only a very limited time of employment. This has been noticed by court of law. He government must implement a scheme for a minimum standard of wages and then ensure that payment is made without erosion by corrupt officials or political elements.

4. The right to a home with a roof. It is not just the nomads of Rajasthan or south India that go homeless. Crores live inhuman lives in urban ghettos and slums, and on the margins of villages, a plastic sheet or some branches of a tree their only shelter. Urban and rural housing schemes have never been evolved to take into account the needs of the very poor. In an age where real estate speculator and corporates are making thousands of crores of profits buying land from peasants to make luxury houses for the upper middle class, a major silent population looks for space to live. There is urgent need for a comprehensive rural and urban housing policy which will create shelter for crores of families and also organise growth in urban an semi urban areas. This will have a salutary impact on health, education and other social parameters.

5. The right to Clothing. The naked Indian is not a metaphor. In slums and villages, it is the reality for large numbers of people, specially women and children. Affordable clothing is desperately needed, not just to shelter the body from the elements, but as an integral part of human dignity.

6. A genuine right to education. The Right to Education Bill remains mired in controversies, litigation and the apathy of state governments who are charged with implementing it. Minority education and rural education are particular victims. Rural schools still remain without teachers, buildings toilets and black boards and textual material. Specially ignored are schools for Dalits, Tribals and the homeless. Governments must build more hostels so that children in remote areas have access to education and a suitable environment. The governments have still to evolve a comprehensives vocational training and higher education policy to ensure employability of the youth.

7. The right to Health. India has amongst the world’s highest infant mortality, and deaths of women in childbirth. Though major epidemics have been prevented, tuberculosis, malaria and malnutrition-induced diseases ravage the land. The poor cannot afford Medicare. Government must evolve a national health policy and health insurance to make state of the art medical services and cover available across the country, specially in remote and inaccessible areas.

8. The right to justice. This basic right is ignored, abused, and trampled upon. The poor believe there is no justice in the land. The criminal and civil justice system needs to be reformed, once again at the basic block and district level to cut down on the backlog, with judges who are sensitive to the needs of the disenfranchised. The people must feel there is justice in India.

9. The right to movement. It is a shame that the people of a free and independent India are subjected to the, violence and official persecution when they seek to migrate to the big cities, pilloried for their regional background and barred from employment, housing and liberty. Police harassment and violence at the hands of communal and sectarian elements is the norm for people moving to Mumbai, for instance. Strong and urgent steps are required to curb such intolerance and to ensure that people moving and migrating for employment have their rights fully protected.

10. The right over land, water, and air by the Tribals, the right not to be forcibly dislocated and dispossessed -- the interests of people and State, and not corporate sector to be safeguarded. State terror is not the response required in response to the Tribals effort to protect themselves when corporates seek to pillage and pirate their natural resources and dispossess them of their homes, their lands and all they hold sacred. PESA must be implemented in letter and spirit, as must the Forest Act and the guarantees under the 5th and 6th Schedules. Governors of States must be held personally responsible for any violation, as they are the guardians of these guarantees. It will not do to label dissent and protest as Maoist or extremist political activist. A political solution must be sought to end armed conflict instead of unleashing police and paramilitary terror. Those arrested without adequate reason must be released forthwith.

11. Completing the land reforms. The government must immediately revive the land reforms process to end injustice in rural India. Definitive policies must be evolved to prevent coercive alienation of land by state or non-state parties.

12. The right of women in general, and specially women of the poor and disposed. Rape, Khap Panchayats, domestic violence, the plight of domestic women labour point to the fact that India has no respect for its women. The National Policy on Women remains on paper. A national gender policy must be evolved to cover all aspect of a women’s experience – from violence, patriarchy, employment, personal and natal health, to emotional security and reforms in laws that betray a gender-imbalance.

13. The right of Freedom of faith and prevention of communal and targetted violence by state and non state players. Muslims feel insecure in India because of their demonization by state and non-state actors, specially of the fundamentalist right hyper nationalists. Their personal laws are perpetually being questioned. There are hundreds of communal riots every year of which Muslims are the main victims. Persecution of Christians is rampant in a number of states. Several states also have the notorious Freedom of Religion Acts, which severely target the Christian community and which leads to violence at the hands of Hindutva elements. Freedom of faith must be ensured without any dilution. These so called Freedom of Religion Acts must be repealed forthwith. The Communal and Targetted Violence [prevention, rehabilitation and reparation] Bill must be made into law

14. The right for dignity, and the rights of the Dalits. Dalits continue to suffer an assault on their rights and their dignity. Laws for their protection and development must be implemented in letter and spirit, specially in states where these are flouted with impunity.

15. The rights of the Dalit Muslims and Dalit Christians. These communities have been betrayed by the political class at the behest of communal elements. Their Freedom of faith ahs been abrogated by the Presidential Order of 1950, now Part III of Article 341. Government must restore with immediate effect the full guarantees they once enjoyed as members of the Scheduled castes, including economic, employment, education and political rights now given to Dalits espousing the Hindu, Sikh and Buddhist faiths.

16. The right of free assembly by labour and peasants, and the right to free speech and expression without intimidation and censorship. Neo liberal policies have seen a decimation of the right of the working class, specially their right to form associations and unions. Police and state governments have acted at the behest of the corporate sector to “ensure” a liberal industrial climate. The rights of the working class must be restored and protected.

17. Reforms in the Panchayati Raj. The Panchayati raj was an important step in bringing self-governance to the villages. But experience has shown that it has been subverted by caste, class and vested interests. It must be restored to its pristine form with further safeguards to protect the interests of women, Dalits and religious minorities.

18. Need for a National Policy on natural resources to prevent their exploitation by national and international corporates; checks and balances on international corporates and national monopolies, specially in the realm of natural resources. Steps needed to end the nexus between politicians, administrations and media, and national and international monopolies, specially in mining and power sectors.

19. Electoral reforms from Panchayat Raj to Lok Sabha. Reforms must be devised and implemented to end the intrusion of money power, caste, extreme ideologies, hate and other extraneous factors in elections. The Election Commission must be empowered to disbar candidates with a criminal record, or professing communal and exclusionist ideologies.

20. Police reforms. It has been four decades since the Dharam Vira Commission suggested reforms to modernize the police force still rooted in its colonial past and a century-old code that was created to keep a subject people under duress. It has no place in a modern world. Police informs should involve changes in recruitment and training policies, deployment and policing procedures, more scientific investigation, end to third degree and other extra judicial procedures and the registering of crime.

21. Judicial reforms are the natural consequence of police and other reforms. Time now to take a deeper look into the criminal and civil justice system from the lowest courts to the highest, the Supreme Court. Judicial service reforms must follow the police reforms. At the level of the high courts and Supreme Court, there must be a transparent system of appointment of judges and their promotion.

22. Checking corruption. There has been much noise about fighting corruption and an independent investigation agency such as the CBI without political control. There is however need for caution. The emerging authority must not be allowed to become a monster. There is need for an ombudsman whose appointment is transparent, but who remains within parliamentary scrutiny. So indeed must the Central Bureau of Investigation instead of becoming a terror stalking the land on a perpetual witch-hunt.

23. Policies for peace in the region. India spends billions on defence against possible invasions from its neighbours. Their policies as much as domestic hyper nationalists and their jingoism have so far prevented the evolution of any worthwhile peace doctrine for south Asia, or long term relationships with China, Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, apart from Afghanistan and Myanmar. While national interests are paramount, there is need to look for diplomatic methodology that overcomes rhetoric and paranoia and seeks lasting peace and economic development as a worthwhile objective. This alone will held reduce defence expenditure and shift focus to national and regional development. The big brother attitude is no longer valid.

24. Emphasis not on nuclear energy and big dams, which poison or dislocate, but on renewable sources of energy, which generates employment and reaches to the distant village and hamlet.

25. And Finally, Good Governance as a right of the people. It is not a favour. No one who cannot government must be allowed to come to power.

--

First published in Social Action, New Delhi ISI, July 2013. Dr. John Dayal is a member of the National Integration Council of Govt of India.

Ramadan 1434: Friends

$
0
0

Swastik Pal, TwoCircles.net

Faiz, aged 21 and Shaquib aged 23 bond over computer at their house during Ramadan. Both have completed their Graduation from Kolkata.

Former Pak’s Ambassador to US, Sherry Rehman to speak at Jamia

$
0
0

By TCN News,

New Delhi: Ms. Sherry Rehman, former Pakistan’s Ambassador to the United States and former Federal Minister of Information & Broadcasting will be delivering a Public Lecture in Jamia Millia Islamia on “Transition and Opportunity: Regional Peace and the Strategic Imagination”.

The Pakistan Studies Programme at the Academy of International Studies, Jamia Millia Islamia in collaboration with the Jinnah Institute, Islamabad and the Australia-India Institute, Melbourne have instituted a Distinguished Speaker Series in which eminent persons from India and Pakistan can visit each other’s countries and deliver lectures at their premier educational institutions.

The Lecture is scheduled to be held on July 31, 2013 at 11 AM in Tagore Hall, Dayar-I-Mir Taqi Mir, Jamia Millia Islamia. The Lecture will be chaired by Prof S M Sajid, officiating Vice Chancellor of Jamia Millia Islamia.

Under this Lecture Series, eminent persons deliver lectures at premier educational institutions in the two countries. The purpose of this exchange is to create greater interaction between scholars and experts between the two countries which will be beneficial to the academic community of both countries. The idea is also to facilitate the visit of highly respected and distinguished personalities from India and Pakistan to each other’s country to engage a wider audience in New Delhi and Islamabad.



Sherry Rehman

The first lecture in the series was delivered by Mr. Syed Salim Raza, former Governor of the State Bank of Pakistan in December 2011 and the second by Mr. Javed Jabbar, former Senator and Minister of Information and Broadcasting in January 2012. The third one by Prof. Akmal Hussain, Distinguished Professor of Economics, Forman Christian College University and Honorary Distinguished Professor, Beaconhouse National University on 29th March 2012.

The current speaker, Ambassador Sherry Rehman was till recently Pakistan’s Ambassador to the United States and a Member of the National Assembly of Pakistan from the Pakistan People’s Party. She has served as Federal Minister for Information and Broadcasting Pakistan (2008-09) and as a ranking member of the Parliamentary Committee on National Security. She has also held three additional portfolios of Health, Women’s Development and Culture as Federal Minister. For her services to Pakistan, she has been awarded the state’s highest civil award, the Nishan-i-Imtiaz in March 2013.

As Federal Minister, Sherry Rehman made history by presenting a comprehensive briefing on National Security to an in camera joint sitting of Pakistan’s Parliament in October 2008. She is also the architect of the first parliamentary charter and bill for women’s empowerment, mover of the Hudood Ordinances Repeal Bill, mover of the Anti-Honour Killings Bill, as well as the Freedom of Information Act 2004. Her bills include the removal of colonial press laws in Pakistan, as well as legislation on Domestic Violence and Affirmative Action for Women.

Sherry Rehman is also an award-winning journalist from Pakistan with 20 years of experience in both the broadcast and the print media. She is the former editor of the Herald news magazine, and was recognized by the UK House of Lords for independent journalism at the Annual British Muslim Ceremony in 2002. She serves as the Chair of the Lady Dufferin Foundation Trust, the largest non-profit provider of women and children’s subsidised healthcare in the province of Sindh. She has also served on the board of the Sindh University and the International School in Karachi as well as the Mohatta Palace Gallery Trust. Rehman is also one of the founding members of the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan.

Hindu nationalism has some other meaning: Ram Puniyani

$
0
0

By Abdul Gani, TwoCirces.net,

Guwahati: Slamming senior BJP leader Narendra Modi renowned, activist and scholar Ram Puniyani said that the communalism force will destroy the peace of the country. Taking part in a lecture session in Sociology department of Gauhati University in Assam, the former Bombay IIT professor advocated on making films and other means to spread secularism among the mass.

He was reacting to the famous quote of the Gujrat Chief Minister Narendra Modi when he had said of himself as Hindu Nationalist.

“I understand Narendra Modi is a born Hindu but when he says that he is a Hindu Nationalist it means something else. Mahatma Gandhi too was a Hindu but he never said that he was a Hindu Nationalist rather he was an Indian Nationalist and in the same line Maulana Kalam Azad was born Muslim but was an Indian Nationalist,” the biomedical engineering professor said addressing the gathering.



Activist Ram Puniyani delivering his lecture.

He said that Madhav Sadashiv Golwalkar and Muhammad Ali Jinnah were Hindu and Muslim nationalist respectively.

Expressing concern at the growing communalism he said it’s a threat to the integrity of the country. “We stand at a very crucial hour and a danger situation. And we need to be careful. We need to save the secularism for saving democratic values,” said Puniyani who is also associated with various secular and democratic initiatives like All India Secular Forum, Centre for Study of Society and Secularism.

According to him various sections of the society are divided by the work people do but not by the religion people practice. “The deprived or the marginalised people in our society will have same feelings and problems barring their different religions. So, even if they beling to different religions they are a section,” he added.

Further, he advocated popularising the message secularism among the mass of the country with various means. “We can arrange lecture session or even we can make films reflecting the values of secularism. If a film club is created and such issues can be discussed over there, it will be a step towards a big goal,” he said.

He also highlighted the gender biasness in the present context of the society. He said that in spite of having three powerful Goddess in the form of Durga, Swarswati and Lakshmi, the women have always been neglected for ages.

Coalition Against Genocide representative meet Kerry, urges to continue the visa ban on Modi

$
0
0

By TCN News,

Washington DC: Following the US tour by BJP President Mr. Rajnath Singh to plead with Members of Congress for a US visa for Gujarat CM Narendra Modi, a representative of the Coalition Against Genocide (CAG) met with Secretary of State John Kerry and updated him on the ongoing cases of human rights violations against Modi and his administration.

Manzoor Ghori, who represented the Coalition Against Genocide at the annual Iftar gathering organized by the US Department of State, handed a letter to the Secretary of State. The letter stated that rescinding the visa-ban on Mr. Modi would be immoral and inimical to the interests of United States internationally. "The US must take a moral lead when it comes to issues of gross human rights violations and Modi's visa was revoked because of his role in the 2002 anti-minority massacres," Ghori said.

It should be noted that Secretary Kerry himself, as a Senator representing Massachusetts, had written a letter in 2008 to the State Department urging the continuation of the visa ban on Modi. The documentation delivered by Mr. Ghori to the Department of State included a copy of the State Department's response to then Senator Kerry's letter which assured him that: "The Department is extremely sensitive to your concerns and we are cognizant of the human rights abuses Mr. Modi has committed" and went on to say "..should we receive an (visa) application, we assure you that it would be adjudicated in strict accordance with the Immigration and Naturalization Act (INA), including Section 212(a)(2)(G) which states that 'any alien who, while serving as a foreign government official, was responsible for or directly carried out, at any time, particularly severe violations of religious freedom, as defined in section 3 of the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 is inadmissible."

After the US visa ban was imposed on Mr. Modi in 2005, his administration continued severe human rights and religious freedom violations against minorities in the state of Gujarat, including the use of his Home ministry for conducting fake police "encounter killings" of innocent youth to polarize the masses into voting for him. Mr. Modi also instituted an anti-conversion law which has made religious conversion into a criminal offence.

Coalition Against Genocide includes a diverse spectrum of organizations and individuals in the United States and Canada that have come together in response to the Gujarat genocide to demand accountability and justice.

Viewing all 4241 articles
Browse latest View live